Recent decision of HEC to abandon its quality rankings [1] needs to be welcomed. It was an initiative motivated by hubris with scant regard to societal and industry requirements. It was conceived and designed by those who wanted all the universities to become research universities and clones of each other. It was a whip with which to make all the universities fall into the same line ignoring their local, geographical, societal, and industry specific contexts and distinct advantages. The criteria appeared to have been designed to satisfy the Western industry and societal requirements, and not from the point of view of national and regional requirements. The ranking was called quality ranking but was nothing more than measurement of quantities devoid of any qualitative input. It was plagued by political considerations for a quota system. It had the audacity to measure quality of teaching with PhD degrees, and did not discriminate at all across different disciplines with their unique requirements. Above all, there was no mechanism of verification of data. The ranking criteria had too many infirmities and was modified each time under political pressure. It gave too much weight to input and too little weight to outcomes and impact under the assumption that output measurements will suffice. Societal and Industry impact measurement was conspicuous by its absence. Bureaucratic measures of impact were considered to substitute for feedback from industry and society. There was little recognition of the quality of university processes. Above all, HEC being a funding agency and a regulator could not simultaneously also act as a ranking agency because it would try to give more weight to its own funding decisions. Hence, the ranking criteria became nothing more than the criteria of measuring the decisions of HEC fundings.
[Work in Process]
Quota System for Provincial and Public Sector
Assumed all disciplines are same and numbers have the same significance for different disciplines.
No System for Independent Verification of Data
Too much Criteria weight to Inputs
[Work in Process]
Distortions Caused in Higher Education Focus
Measuring Quality vs Measuring Quantity
Designers of ranking criteria focused on convenience and availability of data rather than on trying to measure the qualitative parameters. No measure of process.Equated Teaching Quality with Number of PhDs
HEC ranking naively assumed that having a PhD automatically improves the quality of teaching and engagement with the students. It ignored that a PhD is only an acknowledgement of attaining the status of independent researcher. A PhD says nothing about the quality of teaching. In fact, good researchers are often worse teachers.
Quota System for Provincial and Public Sector
Assumed all disciplines are same and numbers have the same significance for different disciplines.
No System for Independent Verification of Data
Criteria Disconnect with Society and Industry Needs
Too much Criteria weight to Inputs
Too much Criteria weight to output and ignored outcomes and process
Negligible Measurement of Societal and Industry Impact
Didn't Consult and Measure Industry and Employers' Feedback
A Regulator and Funding Agency Can't be Ranking Agency
References:
[1] HEC Abandons Ranking of UniversitiesSee also:
- Power of Word in Value Based Education: Discriminating Truth from Falsehood
- Metro/trains vs hospitals vs schools: Where to Allocate Meagre Resources
- How to become a Life-Long Learner: Mission of Developing Life-Long Learners
- Shahjehan S Karim - Visionary Social and Ethical Leadership
- How do I lift thee from the mundane: Musings of a Dean
- Dr Wahab and IBA of 1980s and 1990s
- Youth Leadership and Dave Ulrich-Orientation for University Students
- Why Engineering Students are Reluctant to become Entrepreneurs: Role of PEC and Universities
- Change Management in Academics: Change Agents and Credit Hours
- 6 Trends that will Determine your Career Success in the 21st Century
- Nine (9) Dimensions of Ethical Leadership
- Time Management of Social/Marriage Events in Karachi: A Case Study of How to Create Social and Youth Impact
- Why Education and Why Higher Education: Leadership in Life and Society
- Georgia - Lesson in Preserving Language, Religion and Culture
- What Inspires Me: Leadership Against All Odds
- Entrepreneurial Leadership for 21st Century
- Why Job Security?
- Four Legacies of a Leader: Which one would you leave behind?
- Myth: We are Backward because we Lag Behind in Science and Technology
- Why PhD is Difficult to Complete and Why there are so many ABDs and PhD Dropouts
- What does it Mean to Have a PhD: Myths of Specialization and Departmental Expertise
- Myth: Mushroomings of Universities in Pakistan
- Myth: We are Backward because we Lag Behind in Science and Technology
- 5 Myths of Higher Education in Pakistan
- Power of Word in Value Based Education: Discriminating Truth from Falsehood
- Why I am a Faculty Member
- How Schools Teach Students to Hate Reading: Mass Creation of Non-Readers
- Why Students Avoid and Stop Taking the Course of Some Teachers: 7 Top Reasons
- Why Educational Experiments are "Doomed" to Succeed?
- Abuse of Presentation Slides in Classrooms: Ban Powerpoint Presentations
- What Students Expect from their Teachers: Roles and Responsibilities of Teachers
- Who Fails when a Student Fails
No comments:
Post a Comment