Tuesday, April 2, 2013

Myth: Mushroomings of Universities in Pakistan


I think we were and are being sold this myth of "Mushrooming of Universities in Pakistan" because there are forces that do not want 20,000 universities coming up in Pakistan and would like to cap the number of universities and HEIs (Higher Education Institutions) to a small manageable and controllable number. In 2006, in India there were over 22,000 engineering colleges, institutes and universities of all hues and shades in public and private sector. Of courses, not all of them had the stature of IITs, but there were plenty providing a useful service.



Actually, there is a 20-80 rule working here. If you have 200 universities, 20% of these i.e. 40 would be high quality. However, if there are 2000 universities, then there would be 20% i.e. 400 quality institutions, and if the total figure goes up to 20,000 then we would have 4000 high quality universities. Hidden agenda of foreign donor agencies never wanted this kind of explosion and concomitant increase in quality institutions in Pakistan. Their agenda is to keep us as captive consumers not transform us as net producers. Hence, they funded heavily the HEC to stifle the growth of the private sector through useless quality initiatives not practiced by any HEC equivalent body in most countries of the world. 

Let me give you the example of Austin, Texas where I went to study. Around 1990 the population of Austin was around 400,000. UT Austin's student population was over 50,000. There was another private university, St Edwards in Austin with over 10,000 students, not to speak of so many 2-year community colleges leading the students to the 4 year programs of the universities. 22 miles south of Austin was San Marcos, a small town, where the university had over 20,000 students. 60 miles to the north was Waco, where the university had over 40,000 students. Around 100 miles to the east was College Station where Texas A&M university had over 35,000 students. We are just talking about small population centers (even smaller than Austin) around the heart of the biggest state Texas of USA. We have not even included the student population figures of the three biggest cities of Texas, namely Houston, San Antonio and Dallas/Fort Worth.

How many universities in Pakistan can boast of on-campus population of over 20,000, let alone 50,000+.

Around 2005-06 the population of Pakistan was 160million and the total number of university students was 400k. In the nineties Texas had a population of around 25million and the number of students was over 900k. With this ratio, only Karachi with a population of around 20million needs double the combined number of students of all the universities in Pakistan, public and private together!

There goes the myth of mushrooming of universities and HEIs!

I think the myth of mushrooming of higher education institutions was propagated through influential spokespersons to debilitate the nascent private sector and clip its wings before it could fly. This was done by erecting high entry barriers including financial and non-financial barriers. The propagators of this myth never understood or did not want to understand the theory of market dynamics. The market has its own mechanisms for ensuring the desired quality. Market forces eventually decide which universities would survive and which would fold under. It is the survival of the fittest. However, bureaucrats sitting in Islamabad wasting millions of dollars of aid money to be paid by the tax money extracted from our future generations of poor Pakistanis have no inclination to study or understand the quality demands of the market forces.

The objectives of bureaucracy has always been to increase their turf, control and power. A government organization always wants to have more and more areas under its control to justify its importance, to grow and create opportunities for spreading its tentacles. The problem with the growth of government organizations is that they feed upon the tax money extracted from the hard earned money of the poor people.
Like all other countries, rich people in Pakistan through their powerful lobbies find ways and means to avoid giving proportional taxes. Only the poor, salaried and captive consumers end up paying the taxes.  The problems get further compounded when the government lacks transparency in decision making and there are major good governance issues.

Therefore, it is a famous saying that "Less Government is More Government".

The task of government is to facilitate and get out of the way. The more it intrudes, the more fat the bureaucracy accumulates, the more heavily taxed the economy becomes, the more burden a common person accumulates. Efficient market economies have their own weed out mechanisms for substandard products.

If any institution is not offering quality services, students would stop going to it. Market forces would eject that institution. We saw this happening after the dotcom crash. There used to be a time when every nook and corner had IT institutes coming up and offering their wares. Only the committed and dedicated survived. Market forces determined whether the product offered was genuine and those not fulfilling a genuine demand folded up.

The government organizations all over the world thrive on fear and extend their control and turf and generate their own momentum and thrust using the fallout after every adverse incident as  a pretext.

________________________

This write-up is an extended rehash of the ideas presented in a talk on "Five Major Myths of Higher Education" made at the CIO Conference, March 2009 at Sheraton, Karachi. See another link


This is the 2nd of the Five Major Myths of Higher Education in Pakistan:

  1. Our backwardness is because of science and technology 
  2. There is mushrooming of educational institutions in Pakistan 
  3. Public universities cost lower than private universities 
  4. Bigger infrastructure (land, building, equipment) means better education 
  5. Impact Factor research measures real impact

No comments:

Post a Comment