[Delivered as L2L Talk on 2011-03-20]
A child is naturally curious and interested in exploring about things that he does not know. Complex and unknown things are the ones that interest him (and us). We are interested in mysteries, conspiracy theories, adventure, drama, and are amused by the unexpected, stupendous, super-natural or sci-fi. We insult a child's intelligence by thinking that he can not understand complex things. We think that the only way to teach him is to progress from simple to complex. First drill in him simple concepts. He will only understand complex concepts, once he has mastered the simple things.
This is an insult to the intelligence of a child because the child has proven through his mastery of his mother tongue that he learns from complex to simple. Parents start talking to him naturally, with full sentences much before when he could say a single word. They talk to him, sing to him using natural language. Any computer scientist will tell you that one of the most complex problems that computers have addressed is natural language processing. Within one to two years most children have started using the natural language. We also see the attempt of the kid to stand, walk, climb, balance and now even use mobile phones; which are extremely complex manoeuvres if you ask any robotics expert. In fact, a kid is extremely interested in all the complex things that he sees his elders doing, and wants to copy them irrespective of all the setbacks, injuries, falls and false starts. Study of how a child masters these skills reveal that the child is progressing from complex to simple and not the other way round. Because this is exciting and adventurous, the child is willing to suffer through all the setbacks without getting discouraged.
However, when our teaching content progresses tediously and painstakingly from simple to complex, when week after week and month after month it keeps on lingering on what the kids have already seen and experienced, they lose their interest, and hence their curiosity, wonder and their natural ability to learn. Then we are forced to employ unnatural and forceful ploys to engage their attention. Schools then have to resort to bribes, threats or humiliation, the three most effective ways to control children:
This is the essence of project based learning.
Credits: Inspired by Frank Smith's "Insult to Intelligence: Bureaucratic Invasion of Classrooms".
A child is naturally curious and interested in exploring about things that he does not know. Complex and unknown things are the ones that interest him (and us). We are interested in mysteries, conspiracy theories, adventure, drama, and are amused by the unexpected, stupendous, super-natural or sci-fi. We insult a child's intelligence by thinking that he can not understand complex things. We think that the only way to teach him is to progress from simple to complex. First drill in him simple concepts. He will only understand complex concepts, once he has mastered the simple things.
However, when our teaching content progresses tediously and painstakingly from simple to complex, when week after week and month after month it keeps on lingering on what the kids have already seen and experienced, they lose their interest, and hence their curiosity, wonder and their natural ability to learn. Then we are forced to employ unnatural and forceful ploys to engage their attention. Schools then have to resort to bribes, threats or humiliation, the three most effective ways to control children:
- Bribe through grades, happy-face, stars, awards, and presents, or
- Threat through F-grades, failure, detention, loss of privileges, loss of access to recess/playground, or
- Humiliation by throwing them out of the class, making them stand, made fun of, labeling, and scapegoating.
- See also: Why My Child does not Sit and Concentrate
- See also: Testing/Grading vs Motivation: A Variation on Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle for Academics
This is the essence of project based learning.
Credits: Inspired by Frank Smith's "Insult to Intelligence: Bureaucratic Invasion of Classrooms".
See also:
- How to define success of a school or a student
- Syllabus Coverage is the Enemy of Understanding
- Iqbal's view on What is Meant to be Educated
- Bell-curve assumption about the distribution of intelligence of students
- Charter of Children's Recognition
- How Maths is Made More Difficult
- Beauty is our Business: Dijkstra and Mathematics
- Holistic Learning and Whole Life Orientation
- Education as Tazkia: Is a child like a clean slate?
- Testing/Grading vs Motivation: A Variation on Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle for Academics
- How Schools Teach Students to Hate Reading: Mass Creation of Non-Readers
- From Disposable Cups to Throwaway Relationships: Costs of Disposable Culture
- A Formula is Worth a Thousand Pictures: Dijkstra vs Buzan's Mind-Maps
- Testing/Grading vs Motivation: A Variation on Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle for Academics
- Why Project Based Learning? An Experiential Learning Case Study of Language Teaching
- Overprotected Kids: Need for Risk Taking and Self Discovery
- How Language Acquisition is Made Difficult for Children: Eight Lessons from an Urdu Acquisition Case Study
- Problems with Bloom's Taxonomy: Impact on Curriculum and Motivation of Students
- Most Effective Way of Cutting a Nation from its History and Ideals - Imposing a Foreign Language
- How our Curriculum Design (from Simple to Complex) Insults the Intelligence of a Student
- Structural Paradigm of Schools: Foundations and Assumptions
We as teachers, try to impose our will on the students and we train them to become our replica, where as we are supposed to inspire them to become, what they are.
ReplyDeleteFor them we are from the past and they are for the future, the future which is not exisiting in physical form, so we can not push them from behind we need to hold their hands to to the future by being ahead of them mentally through VISION for the future, which is not a physical entity, at the moment.
Please see my post on Which field should my child choose that has scope (http://ahsanmemorial.blogspot.com/2013/03/which-field-should-my-child-choose.html). This talks about enabling the child to realize his/her own potential and explore what contribution can he make to the society.
DeleteI think there is a dire need for teachers to have a paradigm shift and come out of the syllabus-completed-on-time mentality. Teachers are often afraid of missing the syllabus completion deadlines. They should at least start any topic with a complex but real life problem and have discussion and let the students build the problem and dig down in to it.
DeleteMind Tapping Articles Dr Irfan. Truly your articles and your Institution have changed my thinking all together. Now I'm teaching with a totally new Perspective, new vision and new hope that I'm going to change the lives of my students for good and for better InshAllah.
ReplyDeleteFrank Smith's book Insult to Intelligence not only changed my thinking upside down, but also compelled me to reanalyze all my theories. I have detailed this in another blog post: Testing/Grading vs Motivation: A Variation on Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle for Academics. Please read it too.
Delete